
Building a worldwide coaching platform.
Most fencers train at one club with one coach. But what if a fencer in Cairo could upload a three-minute bout, and in 20 minutes receive an annotated video, voice commentary, and performance ratings from a coach in Paris? That is the exact scenario our team of 2 internationally competitive fencers and MIT coach with decades of experience envisioned: leveraging powerful modern media, annotation, and transcription technology so a coach in Seoul can serve a student in Buenos Aires through the shared language of fencing and boundless improvement.
The coach's canvas.
A fencing bout is dense - dozens of discrete actions in a few minutes. We gave coaches the tools to break a bout apart, layer voice and drawings onto each moment, and hand back a structured review the student can follow from the broad strokes down to the smallest detail.


Every tool composes into a session.
Segments that nest inside segments. Playback that stays in sync with voice. Recording that knows exactly where you are in the bout. These are not mockups - try them.
Watch the distance on the advance-lunge. Preparation is too shallow - extend before the foot leaves.
Clarity for the student.
The student side strips away tool complexity. Upload a bout, pick a coach, pay, and receive a structured review - ratings, annotated footage, and voice commentary in one feed.
1Upload bout footage
Trust signals on both sides.
Students rate coaches after each review. Coaches earn tier promotions based on volume and quality. Both sides can see how the system works - trust is built into the design.
What a two-sided market actually unlocks.
The hardest part was not the annotation engine or the segment tree. It was understanding that a fencing coach does not review video the way a film editor does. They scrub, point, speak, and move on. The tool had to disappear behind the coaching.
But the deeper realization was this: a two-sided coaching market does not just eliminate geography. It exposes a fencer in Buenos Aires to a sabre tradition they would never encounter at their local club. It lets a Hungarian coach share decades of counter-attack thinking with an epeeist in Seoul. The platform does not merely connect supply and demand - it creates a channel for the exchange of styles, philosophies, and competitive instincts that no single club, federation, or geography could contain.


I can't get the parry-riposte timing against French Grip right. Can you help me look it over?